Application security feature

Mobile app SIEM integration

Otukan delivers normalised mobile threat signals to the SIEM and SOC workflow you already run, with agreed severity, deduplication and minimal personal data.

  • Android
  • iOS
  • Flutter
  • React Native
Mobile attacks unseen is met at the soc correlation boundary before it reaches the appMobile attacks unseenSOC correlationYour app
  • Where analysts work

    Mobile threat signals arrive in the SIEM your SOC already watches, next to login, API and fraud logs.

  • Alerts, not floods

    Deduplication and summaries keep repeated device noise out of the queue, while high-severity signals arrive one by one.

  • Lean by default

    Only the fields a correlation needs leave Otukan, with pseudonymous identifiers in place of personal data.

SOC use cases for mobile signals

Choose a use case to see what Otukan detects in the app, what the app does and what your SOC receives.

Credential stuffing via emulators

  1. Detect

    Otukan recognises emulated devices at sign-in across many accounts.

  2. Respond

    Sign-in on emulated sessions is limited per your policy.

  3. Report

    Your SIEM receives a summary per time window that analysts can join with failed-login logs.

Repackaged app campaign

  1. Detect

    Integrity checks find copies of your app with altered code or a foreign signing identity.

  2. Respond

    Modified copies are kept out of sensitive flows.

  3. Report

    A high-severity alert names the affected build so the SOC can open a takedown and user-warning case.

Account takeover attempt

  1. Detect

    Otukan detects hooking or remote control of the screen at login.

  2. Respond

    The app restricts the session and the backend asks for a stronger factor.

  3. Report

    The alert carries the pseudonymous account key, ready to join with identity logs that show a new device or a password reset.

Tooling wave after a release

  1. Detect

    Instrumentation signals rise on a newly shipped build.

  2. Respond

    The app keeps applying your rules for that build; any tightening ships as a reviewed policy version.

  3. Report

    A trend alert tied to the build tells the SOC and the app team to look together.

What Otukan hands to your SOC

Each part makes mobile signals behave like any other well-formed security source.

  • Normalised fields

    A stable field set for every signal, so parsing rules and dashboards survive new checks and new app versions.

  • Agreed severity

    Otukan's severity levels are mapped to the scale your SOC already uses, agreed before the first alert arrives.

  • Deduplication

    Repeated signals from one install in one window are grouped into a single entry with a count.

  • Selective forwarding

    Choose what reaches the SIEM: high-severity signals one by one, lower levels as periodic summaries.

  • Correlation keys

    Pseudonymous install and account keys, build and timestamp let analysts join mobile signals with other logs.

  • Escalation hints

    Each alert states its detection label, so the SOC can tell a lead from a confirmed attack.

You choose the response

Set a response for each user flow. Start by observing, then tighten flow by flow as the signals prove themselves.

Observe

Signal sent to your backend

Rolling out a new policy and measuring real-world signals.

Warn

This device looks modified. Continue with care.

Conditions some genuine users create, such as developer settings.

Restrict

Payments are unavailable on this device.

Payments, stored data and account changes.

Terminate

Session closed for your security.

Clear tampering on a high-risk flow.

How mobile signals reach your SOC

  1. Agree the contract

    Fields, severity mapping and forwarding rules are set with your SOC before delivery starts.

  2. Signals are normalised

    Otukan shapes each record to the agreed fields and removes anything outside scope.

  3. Noise is grouped

    Repeats from one install collapse into counted entries; summaries cover lower levels.

  4. SIEM correlates

    Analysts join mobile alerts with login, API and fraud logs they already hold.

Free for app publishers

Check your app's exposure

A passive review of your published app by an Otukan engineer. No files, no access to your systems. Findings go by email to the verified publisher.

You finish the request on the next page.

Mobile threat data reaches your security operations workflow when it arrives in the SIEM your analysts already watch, in a shape they can correlate. Otukan delivers normalised signals from your protected Android, iOS, Flutter and React Native apps with a stable field set, a severity mapping agreed with your SOC, deduplication of repeated device noise and pseudonymous keys for joining mobile alerts with login, API and fraud logs. You choose what is forwarded: high-severity signals individually and lower levels as summaries. Personal data stays out by design. The delivery option is agreed with your team against the platform you run.

The event contract

A SIEM rewards consistency. If field names shift between app versions, parsing breaks and dashboards go quiet. Otukan treats the fields it sends as a contract agreed with your SOC before the first alert.

Fields your analysts can rely on

FieldPurpose in the SOC
Check and platformTells the analyst what was observed and on which operating system
SeverityRanks the alert on your SOC’s own scale
Detection labelSeparates a lead from a confirmed attack or a business incident
BuildLinks the alert to a specific app release
Pseudonymous install keyGroups alerts from one app instance
Pseudonymous account keyJoins the alert with identity and login logs, where you allow it
Count and windowShows how many times the signal repeated before it was grouped
TimestampsThe moment the check ran on the device and the moment the signal was received

Two clocks, both recorded

Device clocks can be wrong. Otukan records when the check ran on the phone and when the signal reached the backend, so analysts can order events reliably even when a device reports an odd time.

Transport

The way signals travel from Otukan to your SIEM is agreed during onboarding against the platform you already operate. The field contract stays the same whichever option you use.

Operational fit

Severity that matches your queue

Your SOC already has a severity scale and response expectations for each level. Otukan maps its own levels onto yours, so a mobile alert sits in the queue next to comparable alerts from other sources, not in a separate world.

Correlation

Mobile signals are strongest in combination. A hooking alert at sign-in means more when the same account shows a new device and a password reset in your identity logs. The pseudonymous keys and timestamps on every Otukan alert are there to make that join straightforward.

Saved searches that last

Because the fields are stable, your SOC can keep saved searches for mobile patterns: hooking at sign-in joined with password resets, integrity alerts on payment flows, or emulator summaries joined with failed logins. Those searches keep working as new app versions ship, since the build is a field rather than a change in format.

Deduplication

One compromised phone can trigger the same check many times in a session. Otukan groups repeats from one install in one window into a single entry with a count, so analysts see one line with context instead of a wall of copies.

Escalation

Write down who owns a mobile alert at each level. A common split: the SOC triages, application security owns tuning and policy, and fraud joins when money is involved. The detection label on each alert tells the analyst which path to take. Working a mobile case from alert to conclusion is covered on threat investigation workflows.

Data scope

Send what correlation needs

Every field that leaves Otukan should have a reason. Otukan removes anything outside the agreed scope before delivery. Names, phone numbers, email addresses, message content, contacts, precise location and file contents never enter the stream.

Retention responsibilities

Once alerts sit in your SIEM, your retention rules govern them. Otukan documents which fields it sends and why, and agrees its own retention with you before collection starts. That split makes both sides of a privacy review easier to answer.

Account linkage

Linking a pseudonymous key to a real customer should be a deliberate step. Keep that ability with a small group, record when it is used, and let the SOC work with keys for as long as possible.

Proving the feed

Before go-live, reproduce a small set of conditions in an authorised lab and confirm each alert arrives with the agreed fields, severity and grouping. Then run clean journeys and confirm that nothing reaches the SIEM that should not.

The signal record behind these alerts is described on runtime threat signals. Monitoring as a whole is covered on mobile app threat monitoring. Endpoint risk reported from inside the app is covered on mobile endpoint detection signals.

Common questions

  • Which SIEM products does Otukan work with?

    Otukan delivers to the SIEM or SOC platform you already run, using a field format and severity mapping agreed with your SOC. The delivery option is confirmed during onboarding against your platform, so we can talk about it in concrete terms once we know your environment.

  • Will mobile alerts overwhelm our analysts?

    Otukan is set up to keep the queue workable. Repeats from one install are grouped into a counted entry, lower severities arrive as summaries, and each alert says whether it is a lead or a confirmed attack. Your SOC decides the thresholds, and you can tighten or loosen them as volumes become clear.

  • What personal data leaves Otukan for the SIEM?

    As little as correlation needs. Alerts carry pseudonymous install and account keys, build, platform, check, severity and time. Names, phone numbers, email addresses, message content, contacts, precise location and file contents are not sent. Your SIEM's retention rules then apply to the data it holds, and Otukan documents the flow for your privacy team.

  • Can the SOC tell Android and iOS alerts apart?

    Yes. Platform is a field on every alert, and check names are platform-specific. That keeps dashboards honest: a gap between Android and iOS usually reflects what each platform lets an app observe, not a difference in attack volume.

On the mobile engineering team?

How protection fits your build, signing and release, platform by platform.

Put mobile threats in your SOC

Tell us the platforms and app framework, the kind of SIEM or SOC platform you run and which mobile alerts your analysts need first. We do not ask for binaries, signing keys, production credentials or user data.

Or request a technical demo